I’ve just finished the remake of Resident Evil 4, and I keep hearing that the original is fantastic. Now I’m curious if it’s actually worth diving into the original version after experiencing the remake. Are there notable differences between the two?
5 Answers
Nah, I think the remake is superior overall, so I wouldn’t bother with the original if you just played the new one. But if you’re a fan of gaming history, it might still be interesting to see where it all started.
Honestly, I liked the remake better, but the original is a classic. It has that nostalgic charm which got so many of us into the series. If you can get past the older control scheme, it’s a fun trip back in gaming history!
For sure, it’s worth it! I had way more fun with the original compared to the remake. The environments, cutscenes, and character development vary quite a bit—there’s a lot of unique content to explore. Just a heads up, some mechanics, like the knife usage, are different, and you’ll want to be prepared for some intense quick-time events!
Absolutely! They feel like two different games. While the remake is awesome, the original has its own charm and gameplay mechanics that can be really fun. Plus, there are parts in the original that weren’t included in the remake, offering a fresh experience even after beating the newer version.
Yeah, it’s definitely worth your time! The original has a different vibe and storytelling approach that the remake doesn’t capture. It also has some unique story elements. Just be ready for the classic controls—you might need a bit of adjustment if you’re used to modern setups.
